In the May 10 issue of the journal Nature, a Cornell University biogeochemist describes an economical and efficient way to help offset global warming: Pull carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere by charring, or partially burning, trees, grasses or crop residues without the use of oxygen.
This process, he writes, would double the carbon concentration in the residue, which could be returned to the soil as a carbon sink. The exhaust gases from this process and other biofuel production could then be converted into energy.
This so-called biochar sequestration could offset about 10% of the annual U.S. fossil-fuel emissions in any of several scenarios, says Johannes Lehmann, PhD, an associate professor of soil biogeochemistry in the Department of Crop and Soil Sciences.
“Biochar sequestration, combined with bioenergy production, does not require a fundamental scientific advance, and the underlying production technology is robust, clean and simple, making it appropriate for many regions of the world,” Dr. Lehmann says. “It not only reduces emissions but also sequesters carbon, making it an attractive target for energy subsidies and for inclusion in the global carbon market.”
Most plants pull carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere and lock it up in their biomass or in soil organic matter. But taking this a step further, Dr. Lehmann recommends heating the plant biomass without oxygen in a process known as low-temperature pyrolysis. When returned to the soil, biochar creates a stable, long-term carbon sink.
“Biochar also has been shown to improve the structure and fertility of soils, to enhance the retention and efficiency of fertilizers, as well as to improve the productivity of soil,” he says.
Capturing the exhaust gases from the pyrolysis process produces energy in forms like heat, electricity, bio-oil or hydrogen. By adding the biochar to soil, rather than burning it as an energy source (which most companies do), bioenergy can be turned into a carbon-negative industry. Biochar returned to soil not only secures soil health on bioenergy plantations but also reduces greenhouse gas emissions by an additional 12%–84%.
Compared with ethanol production, pyrolysis that produces biochar and bioenergy from its exhaust gases is much less expensive, Dr. Lehmann says, when the feedstock is animal waste, clean municipal waste or forest residues collected for fire prevention.
As the value of carbon dioxide increases on carbon markets, “we calculate that biochar sequestration in conjunction with bioenergy from pyrolysis becomes economically attractive when the value of avoided carbon dioxide emissions reaches $37 per ton,” he says. Currently, the Chicago Climate Exchange is trading carbon dioxide at $4 a ton; it is projected the price will rise to $25–$85 a ton in the coming years.
Note: OrganicAuthority.com publishes science news so organic consumers have access to the latest information on climate change and threats to our environment. You can view more posts by visiting the Environment Section of our blog.